Here is a link to a rather rough cut of my writing in physics podcast.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5LknFx8QunJLVdTM3RPeGd2UVU/view?usp=sharing
There are some definitive weaknesses in this cut that I'll be addressing in my next version. I should be able to sort out the audio's habit of fading out at weird times. I also need to do a far better job integrating my evidence into the podcast.
I think that the podcast follows the genre conventions fairly well overall, but I'd like to know if you agree.
Do you think that starting the body of the podcast with the grant proposal works or should I open with the research paper?
I really enjoyed the way the podcast opened. The form of this project was strictly based around the content of the podcast. Their are some audio issues at which it seemed almost like there wasn't a clear meshing of sections. I really wish there was some sort of inclusion of other voices besides for the main speaker, I'm not sure what you might consider adding in. The organization of this project was excellent and it seemed to flow from thought to thought.
ReplyDelete